On 12/14/2017 11:03 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 09:57 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> sdev->sdev_gendev.parent = get_device(&starget->dev);
>> + if (!sdev->sdev_gendev.parent) {
>> + kfree(sdev);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>
> Are you sure that get_device() can return NULL?
>
If it can't return NULL, why bother having a return value at all?
And this is not the only place where get_device() is checked for a NULL
return value.
We _really_ need to come up with a consistent view here.
If get_device() can never return NULL I would strongly argue for making
it a void function.
If it _can_ return NULL we need to check for it.
Either way I don't mind; but please stay consistent.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
