Re: [BUG] scsi/qla2xxx: a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in qlt_get_tag

[Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2017/12/13 12:42, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 11:18 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > The driver may sleep under a spinlock.
> > The function call paths are:
> > qlt_handle_abts_recv_work (acquire the spinlock)
> >     qlt_response_pkt_all_vps
> >       qlt_response_pkt
> >         qlt_handle_cmd_for_atio
> >           qlt_get_tag
> >             percpu_ida_alloc --> may sleep
> >
> > qla82xx_msix_rsp_q (acquire the spinlock)
> >     qla24xx_process_response_queue
> >       qlt_handle_abts_recv
> >         qlt_response_pkt_all_vps
> >           qlt_response_pkt
> >             qlt_handle_cmd_for_atio
> >               qlt_get_tag
> >                 percpu_ida_alloc --> may sleep-in-atomic
> >
> > qla24xx_intr_handler (acquire the spinlock)
> >     qla24xx_process_response_queue
> >       qlt_handle_abts_recv
> >         qlt_response_pkt
> >           qlt_handle_cmd_for_atio
> >             qlt_get_tag
> >               percpu_ida_alloc --> may sleep
> >
> > I do not find a good way to fix it, so I only report.
> > This possible bug is found by my static analysis tool (DSAC) and
> > checked by my code review.
> The report is incorrect: percpu_ida_alloc with state==TASK_RUNNING is
> atomic (and interrupt) safe which appears to be the case here.
>
> James

Thanks for your reply :)
I have checked the definition of percpu_ida_alloc, and I think you are 
right.
Sorry for my incorrect bug report.


Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai