Re: [PATCH v2] Use blist_flags_t consistently

[Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 08:52 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:08:03PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > +		if (!((__force unsigned int)sdev->sdev_bflags & BIT(i)))
> 
> I'd case the right side argument to  __force blist_flags_t here for
> purely esthetic reasons.
> 
> Except for that this looks fine to me:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Hello Christoph,

Thanks for the review. I will make the proposed change and repost this patch.

Bart.