Re: [PATCH] uas: Add US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk for one more Seagate device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 14-11-17 15:00, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Just like all previous UAS capable Seagate disk enclosures, this
> > one needs a US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk.
> > 
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 3.16
> > Reported-by: Wido <wido.gg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> So far we've been adding quirks for Seagate drives on a one by one
> basis (I started this myself) hoping that one day they will fix
> their ATA_1X pass-through support. But that does not seem to
> be happening.
> 
> Maybe we need to do something like this instead ?   :
> 
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,10 @@ static int uas_use_uas_driver(struct usb_interface *intf,
>                  }
>          }
> 
> + /* All Seagate disk enclosures have broken ATA pass-through support */
> + if (le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idVendor) == 0x0bc2)
> +         flags |= US_FL_NO_ATA_1X;
> +
>          usb_stor_adjust_quirks(udev, &flags);
> 
>          if (flags & US_FL_IGNORE_UAS) {
> 
> 
> Then we can remove a whole lot of quirks and we avoid future
> churn when new Seagate device ids show up.

That is a reasonable approach.  For what it's worth, usb-storage has 
had similar code for many years, affecting devices from Nokia, Nikon, 
Pentax, and Motorola.

Alan Stern




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux