Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] qla2xxx_nvmet: Add files for FC-NVMe Target support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/8/2017 7:17 PM, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
+static struct nvmet_fc_target_template qla_nvmet_fc_transport = {
+	.targetport_delete	= qla_nvmet_targetport_delete,
+	.xmt_ls_rsp		= qla_nvmet_ls_rsp,
+	.fcp_op			= qla_nvmet_fcp_op,
+	.fcp_abort		= qla_nvmet_fcp_abort,
+	.fcp_req_release	= qla_nvmet_fcp_req_release,
+	.max_hw_queues		= 8,
+	.max_sgl_segments	= 128,
+	.max_dif_sgl_segments	= 64,
+	.dma_boundary		= 0xFFFFFFFF,
+	.target_features	= NVMET_FCTGTFEAT_READDATA_RSP |
+					NVMET_FCTGTFEAT_CMD_IN_ISR |
+					NVMET_FCTGTFEAT_OPDONE_IN_ISR,
+	.target_priv_sz	= sizeof(struct nvme_private),
+};


From the patch set prior:
> Agree we do nvme_fc* callbacks in deferred context, but without the xxx_IN_ISR flag during NVMe Target template registration, we were running into crash due to recursive spin_lock held as part of CTIO response in our driver.

Can you look into removing this recursive spin lock ?    I don't think it's a good idea to be holding a spin lock when upcalling the transport.

-- james




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux