On 11/08/2017 04:35 PM, Bryant G. Ly wrote: > > On 7/30/17 5:10 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > >> Hi Xiubo, >> >> Apologies for the delayed response. Comments below. >> >> On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 15:16 +0800, lixiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> From: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> The fifo type waiter list will hold the udevs who are waiting for the >>> blocks from the data global pool. The unmap thread will try to feed the >>> first udevs in waiter list, if the global free blocks available are >>> not enough, it will stop traversing the list and abort waking up the >>> others. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >>> 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >>> >> Applied to target-pending/for-next. >> >> Thanks Xiubo + MNC. >> > Hi Nick, > > Do you know what ever happened to this patch? You mentioned that you had applied the patch but I don't see it anywhere in your tree. > I asked that it be reverted from for-next instead of sending to Linus, because it added several regressions. Instead of adding this patch and adding fixes on top like in this patchset https://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg16121.html, I did this patchset: https://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg16162.html the other day which adds similar support. The first 4 patches and last one are merged in his for-next branch.
