On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:51:36PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 03:26:26AM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote: > > Use vzalloc instead of vmalloc/memset to allocate memory filled with 0 > > value. > > > > Done using Coccinelle. > > Semantic patch used : > > > > @@ > > expression x,a; > > statement S; > > @@ > > > > - x = vmalloc(a); > > + x = vzalloc(a); > > if (x == NULL || ...) S > > - memset(x, 0, a); > > How many false positives do you get? Have you identified any? > If not you should consider adding this SmPL rule to: > > scripts/coccinelle/api/ > > Some maintainers may ask you for the SmPL rule to be upstream first, > not all though. So its good practice for you to strive for this. > Another reason for it to go upstream is then other maintainers > can / should be running coccicheck against their subsystem to avoid > stupid regressions. > > You may want to explain for patches like these that they have been > tested by 0-day without any issues found. > > Also add the tag: > > Generated-by: Coccinelle SmPL > > > Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c | 3 +-- > > drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad_debugfs.c | 8 ++------ > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_bsg.c | 3 +-- > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c | 5 +---- > > drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 6 ++---- > > drivers/scsi/snic/snic_trc.c | 3 +-- > > 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > Split this up per driver, and resend by using ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl > foo.patch and ensuring the right folks get the email. Right now you > just spammed tons of people and the changes may be preferred to go > upstream atomically per driver, always assume this first. > > Other than this, feel free to add to each of the patches you created: > Thanks for the feeedback! I will resend the patch with the necessary changes. > Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Himanshu Jha
