On 11/07/2017 10:10 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 11/07/2017 09:29 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 11/07/2017 09:20 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 10:11 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >>>> If you can reproduce, please provide me at least the following log >>>> first: >>>> >>>> find /sys/kernel/debug/block -name tags | xargs cat | grep busy >>>> >>>> If any pending requests arn't completed, please provide the related >>>> info in dbgfs about where is the request. >>> >>> Every time I ran the above or a similar command its output was empty. I >>> assume that's because the hang usually occurs in a phase where these debugfs >>> attributes either have not yet been created or have already disappeared. >> >> Bart, do you still see a hang with the patch that fixes the tag leak when >> we fail to get a dispatch budget? >> >> https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=151004881411480&w=2 >> >> I've run a lot of stability testing here, and I haven't run into any >> issues. This is with shared tags as well. So if you still see the failure >> case with the current tree AND the above patch, then I'll try and get >> a test case setup that hits it too so we can get to the bottom of this. > > Ming, I managed to reproduce the hang using null_blk. Note this is > WITHOUT the patch mentioned above, running with that now. > > # modprobe null_blk queue_mode=2 nr_devices=4 shared_tags=1 submit_queues=1 hw_queue_depth=1 > > and using this fio file: > > [global] > bs=4k > rw=randread > norandommap > direct=1 > ioengine=libaio > iodepth=4 > > [nullb0] > filename=/dev/nullb0 > [nullb1] > filename=/dev/nullb1 > [nullb2] > filename=/dev/nullb2 > [nullb3] > filename=/dev/nullb3 > > it seemed to keep running, but it hung when exiting. The troublesome > device was nullb1: > > [ 492.513374] INFO: task fio:3263 blocked for more than 120 seconds. > [ 492.520782] Not tainted 4.14.0-rc7+ #499 > [ 492.526247] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. > [ 492.535904] fio D13208 3263 3211 0x00000000 > [ 492.542535] Call Trace: > [ 492.545764] __schedule+0x279/0x720 > [ 492.550151] schedule+0x33/0x90 > [ 492.554145] io_schedule+0x16/0x40 > [ 492.558435] blk_mq_get_tag+0x148/0x250 > [ 492.563211] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 > [ 492.567693] blk_mq_get_request+0xf0/0x3e0 > [ 492.572760] blk_mq_make_request+0xe2/0x690 > [ 492.577913] generic_make_request+0xfc/0x2f0 > [ 492.583177] submit_bio+0x64/0x120 > [ 492.587475] ? set_page_dirty_lock+0x4b/0x60 > [ 492.592736] ? submit_bio+0x64/0x120 > [ 492.597309] ? bio_set_pages_dirty+0x55/0x60 > [ 492.602570] blkdev_direct_IO+0x388/0x3c0 > [ 492.607546] ? free_ioctx_users+0xe0/0xe0 > [ 492.612511] ? blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x238/0x3a0 > [ 492.618353] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0xe/0x20 > [ 492.623227] generic_file_read_iter+0xb3/0xa00 > [ 492.628682] ? generic_file_read_iter+0xb3/0xa00 > [ 492.634334] ? security_file_permission+0x9b/0xc0 > [ 492.640114] blkdev_read_iter+0x35/0x40 > [ 492.644877] aio_read+0xc5/0x120 > [ 492.648973] ? aio_read_events+0x24c/0x340 > [ 492.654124] ? __might_sleep+0x4a/0x80 > [ 492.658800] do_io_submit+0x47c/0x5e0 > [ 492.663373] ? do_io_submit+0x47c/0x5e0 > [ 492.668234] SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x20 > [ 492.672715] ? SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x20 > [ 492.677394] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94 > [ 492.683039] RIP: 0033:0x7f83d1871717 > [ 492.687521] RSP: 002b:00007ffd38fe5a88 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000d1 > [ 492.696969] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f83b6972b50 RCX: 00007f83d1871717 > [ 492.705423] RDX: 0000000001f41418 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 00007f83e4d36000 > [ 492.713889] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000001f3f2e0 > [ 492.722352] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffd38fe5be0 > [ 492.730827] R13: 00007f83b6972b01 R14: 00007f83b69824b8 R15: 00007f83b6982368 > > and if we look at the debug entries, it's waiting on a scheduler tag: > > sched_tags:nr_tags=2 > sched_tags:nr_reserved_tags=0 > sched_tags:active_queues=0 > sched_tags:bitmap_tags: > sched_tags:depth=2 > sched_tags:busy=2 > sched_tags:bits_per_word=64 > sched_tags:map_nr=1 > sched_tags:alloc_hint={0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0} > sched_tags:wake_batch=1 > sched_tags:wake_index=4 > sched_tags:ws={ > sched_tags: {.wait_cnt=-102, .wait=inactive}, > sched_tags: {.wait_cnt=-126, .wait=inactive}, > sched_tags: {.wait_cnt=-72, .wait=inactive}, > sched_tags: {.wait_cnt=-96, .wait=inactive}, > sched_tags: {.wait_cnt=-134, .wait=inactive}, > sched_tags: {.wait_cnt=-116, .wait=inactive}, > sched_tags: {.wait_cnt=-90, .wait=inactive}, > sched_tags: {.wait_cnt=-115, .wait=active}, > sched_tags:} > sched_tags:round_robin=0 > sched_tags_bitmap:00000000: 03 > > with SCHED_RESTART being set: > > state:SCHED_RESTART > > and with the driver tags being idle: > > tags:nr_tags=1 > tags:nr_reserved_tags=0 > tags:active_queues=0 > tags:bitmap_tags: > tags:depth=1 > tags:busy=0 > tags:bits_per_word=64 > tags:map_nr=1 > tags:alloc_hint={0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0} > tags:wake_batch=1 > tags:wake_index=3 > tags:ws={ > tags: {.wait_cnt=-48, .wait=inactive}, > tags: {.wait_cnt=-39, .wait=inactive}, > tags: {.wait_cnt=-50, .wait=inactive}, > tags: {.wait_cnt=-47, .wait=inactive}, > tags: {.wait_cnt=-25, .wait=inactive}, > tags: {.wait_cnt=-24, .wait=inactive}, > tags: {.wait_cnt=-47, .wait=inactive}, > tags: {.wait_cnt=-47, .wait=inactive}, > tags:} Unsurprisingly (since this is sched_tags starvation) this still happens with the patch. Same trace as above. Note that dispatch has two requests sitting ready: ffff881ff5ab1000 {.op=READ, .cmd_flags=, .rq_flags=STARTED|IO_STAT, .atomic_flags=COMPLETE, .tag=-1, .internal_tag=0} ffff881ff5ab1240 {.op=READ, .cmd_flags=, .rq_flags=STARTED|IO_STAT, .atomic_flags=COMPLETE, .tag=-1, .internal_tag=1} while we're blocked trying to get a new sched tag off the regular blk_mq_make_request() path. It looks like a missing restart of the hctx. -- Jens Axboe
