Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: Fix a precedence bug in lpfc_nvme_io_cmd_wqe_cmpl()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/12/2017 1:30 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The ! has higher precedence than the & operation.  I've added
parenthesis so this works as intended.

Fixes: 952c303b329c ("scsi: lpfc: Ensure io aborts interlocked with the target.")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
index 60f0dbd0f192..517ae570e507 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ lpfc_nvme_io_cmd_wqe_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *pwqeIn,
  	/* NVME targets need completion held off until the abort exchange
  	 * completes.
  	 */
-	if (!lpfc_ncmd->flags & LPFC_SBUF_XBUSY)
+	if (!(lpfc_ncmd->flags & LPFC_SBUF_XBUSY))
  		nCmd->done(nCmd);
spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
yep

Signed-off-by:  James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux