Re: [PATCH 9/9] bsg: split handling of SCSI CDBs vs transport requeues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/23/2017 01:17 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Christoph,
> 
>>> Yes, I expected the bsg bits to go through Jens' tree.
>>
>> Ok, then I misremembered it, and we'll have to delay the remaining
>> patches until the next merge window, as they depend on the previous
>> ones.
> 
> I don't mind taking them through SCSI if Jens agrees.

I'm fine with that, as long as the last issue Benjamin brought up has
been fixed up.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux