Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] block, scsi, md: Improve suspend and resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've indeed tested some previous versions of this patchset, but still use 
Ming's solution.

Can it be clarified which one (Bart's or Ming's) is a correct approach?

On středa 18. října 2017 1:28:14 CEST Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/17/2017 05:26 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Hello Jens,
> > 
> > It is known that during the resume following a hibernate, especially when
> > using an md RAID1 array created on top of SCSI devices, sometimes the
> > system hangs instead of coming up properly. This patch series fixes that
> > problem. These patches have been tested on top of the block layer for-next
> > branch. Please consider these changes for kernel v4.15.
> 
> The folks that had trouble with this issue, have they tested the
> patchset? I'd like to get a solution queued up for this sooner rather
> than later, but I'd greatly prefer if we had some folks that have
> tested and verified it.






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux