Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] scsi/pmcraid: Remove an unused structure member

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 08:21 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/17/2017 12:49 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Anil Ravindranath <anil_ravindranath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h
> > index 8bfac72a242b..44da91712115 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h
> > @@ -542,7 +542,6 @@ struct pmcraid_sglist {
> >  	u32 order;
> >  	u32 num_sg;
> >  	u32 num_dma_sg;
> > -	u32 buffer_len;
> >  	struct scatterlist scatterlist[1];
> >  };
> >  
> > 
> 
> This actually is the same story that we've had with ipr (and, looking at
> the code, those two drivers look awfully similar ...).
> pmcraid_sglist looks as if it's a hardware-dependent structure, so just
> removing one entry from the middle of a structure might not be a good idea.
> But this is something for the pmcraid folks to clarify.

Hello Hannes,

Sorry but I don't see how a structure that contains a struct scatterlist
could be hardware-dependent?

Thanks,

Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux