Re: [PATCH V5 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Il giorno 10 ott 2017, alle ore 14:34, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx> ha scritto:
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 01:24:52PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> It's using cfq (for non-mq) and mq-deadline (obviously for mq).
> 
> Please be aware that cfq and mq-deadline are _not_ comparable, for a realistic
> comparasion please use deadline and mq-deadline or cfq and bfq.
> 

Please set low_latency=0 for bfq if yours is just a maximum-throughput test.

Thanks,
Paolo

>> root@(none)$ pwd
>> /sys/devices/platform/HISI0162:01/host0/port-0:0/expander-0:0/port-0:0:7/end_device-0:0:7
>> root@(none)$ more ./target0:0:3/0:0:3:0/block/sdd/queue/scheduler
>> noop [cfq]
> 
> Maybe missing CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE?
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Johannes
> 
> -- 
> Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
> jthumshirn@xxxxxxx                                +49 911 74053 689
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux