On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:50:18AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:30:41PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > the problem with libfc currently is it is made for fcoe, despite being named > > libfc. > > Well, that's my point - we should be able to use more bits in a common > FC layer. I don't really care about the exact name. Yes, that's on my long term TODO list, getting rid of the SKBs used internally so ibmvfc can be switched over, allow the setting of the NVMe Type code (or even arbitrary typecodes) yada, yada. It'll benefit fnic, bnx2fc and qedfc as well, but I haven't been able to do much in this regard. Hannes and I have internal patchsets flying around solving the fist little bits for it but they're far from completion. Byte, Johannes -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
