Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: Align queue to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN innon-coherent DMA mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Christoph

I think we cannot modify dma_get_cache_alignment(), because existing callers may want to unconditionally return ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN.

Huacai
 
 
------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Christoph Hellwig"<hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Date:  Mon, Sep 11, 2017 03:39 PM
To:  "Huacai Chen"<chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
Cc:  "James E . J . Bottomley"<jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Martin K . Petersen"<martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Fuxin Zhang"<zhangfx@xxxxxxxxxx>; "linux-scsi"<linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "stable"<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
Subject:  Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: Align queue to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN innon-coherent DMA mode

 
> +	if (plat_device_is_coherent(dev))

We can't just call platform device code.  We'll need a proper
DMA API call for this.

> +		blk_queue_dma_alignment(q, 0x04 - 1);
> +	else
> +		blk_queue_dma_alignment(q, dma_get_cache_alignment() - 1);

Which we already have with dma_get_cache_alignment, except that it
doesn't take a struct device pointer and doesn't call into dma_map
ops.  So please add a struct device argument to dma_get_cache_alignment,
and let it call into dma_map_ops where needed.

With that you can replace the above with:

	blk_queue_dma_alignment(q,
			max(0x04U, dma_get_cache_alignment(dev)) - 1);




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux