On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:07:04PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 02:49 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > + if ((flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT) && blk_queue_is_freezing(q)) > > + blk_queue_enter_live(q); > > + else > > + ret = blk_queue_enter(q, !(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)); > > Why did you repost this patch series without trying to reach an agreement > about the approach? > > Anyway, because of the unsafe blk_queue_enter_live() call introduced by this > patch, please add the following to the description of this patch whenever you > repost it: > > NAK-ed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx> Did you take a look at the patch 7 or cover letter? In that patch, if preempt freezing is on-progressing, any other freeze can't be started at all, so that is definitely safe to use blk_queue_enter_live() here, isn't it? -- Ming
