Re: [PATCH 1/9] percpu-refcount: introduce percpu_ref_is_dead()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:07:30PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 01:27 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Inside block layer, we need to support to allocate request with
> > RQF_PREEMPT even though queue is frozen.
> 
> Hello Ming,
> 
> Can patch 8/9 be reworked such that it doesn't need the new
> percpu_ref_is_dead() helper function, e.g. by checking q->mq_freeze_depth
> to check whether or not request processing has been frozen? Have you noticed
> that several blk-mq code paths already check q->mq_freeze_depth to check
> whether or not a queue is frozen?

Strictly speaking, that way is wrong, or at least one lock is required
to check the counter, because the percpu-refcount isn't killed yet after
the atomic counter is increased by 1.

So I prefer to use this new helper.

-- 
Ming



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux