Re: [PATCH 5/9] block: introduce blk_drain_queue()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 01:27 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> So that we can support legacy version of freezing queue,
> which is required by safe SCSI quiescing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c       | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/blkdev.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index d579501f24ba..636452f151ea 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -530,6 +530,22 @@ static void __blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool drain_all)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * blk_drain_queue - drain requests from request_queue
> + * @q: queue to drain
> + *
> + * Drain requests from @q.  All pending requests are drained.
> + * The caller is responsible for ensuring that no new requests
> + * which need to be drained are queued.
> + */
> +void blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> +	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> +	__blk_drain_queue(q, true);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_drain_queue);

Hello Ming,

Please drop this patch. As far as I can see this patch series introduces only
one call to blk_drain_queue(), namely in blk_freeze_queue_wait() in patch 6.
My proposal is to inline the body of blk_drain_queue() in blk_freeze_queue_wait()
instead of reintroducing blk_drain_queue() (see also commit 807592a4fafb;
"block: Let blk_drain_queue() caller obtain the queue lock").

Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux