Re: dc395x: Report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Robert Annessi wrote:

> On 08/02/06 01:24, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > a) uncommenting the line
> > 
> > #define DC395x_NO_TAGQ
> 
> I forgot to mention:
> Using this workaround works with 2.6.16 and does not trigger bug().

Yes, this is only present in 2.6.18. And what transfer rates are you 
getting with this workaround without safe=1? Compared to safe=1 and to 
other controllers / drivers?

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux