Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:47:28 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "hch@xxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20170828204539.29289-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Wdcipoutbound: EOP-TRUE

On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 13:45 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The conclusion of a recent discussion about the handling of SCSI device VPD
> [ ... ]

Please ignore this series too. I think I finally found and fixed the bug in
the script I use to post patches ...

Bart.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH v3 0/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: [PATCH v3 3/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rcu: Introduce rcu_swap_protected()
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3 3/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]
Next by thread: [PATCH v3 0/3] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux