Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:07:53 +0200
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>, Shane Seymour <shane.seymour@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20170825203601.23612-3-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

This looks generally good.  But I wonder if there is a way to
factor the assining/clearing sequence into little helpers instead
of duplicating it?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- [PATCH 2/2] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: [PATCH] qlogicpti: fixup qlogicpti_reset() definition
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 04/20] lpfc: Fix oops when NVME Target is discovered in a nonNVME environment
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH 2/2] Rework handling of scsi_device.vpd_pg8[03]
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce scsi_get_vpd_buf()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux