Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/6] hpsa: support legacy boards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/10/2017 04:06 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 09:09 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> No device support in Linux is unsupported, sorry.  I think we're
>> getting into the corporate bullshit game a little too much here.
> 
> I think there are two different definitions of supported here.  To us,
> any device to which the driver attaches is "supported".  However, if
> it's never been tested before it may not work very well.  In the Linux
> way, we'll try to fix the bugs when they're reported and in that sense
> we support the device until nothing in the kernel attaches to its ids
> anymore.
> 
> In the corporate world "supported" means we'll sell you a contract
> giving you certain rights to report bugs and have us fix them.  There
> are definite reasons why corporations only support a small range of new
> devices, even though devices not on this list may still be attached to
> by the driver and thus we (Linux Community) would try to fix the bug
> reports for.
> 
> I think what you're basically asking for is a different name for the
> flag, which is fine?  how about 'legacy' instead?
> 
Sure, no problem with that.

Don?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux