Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] bsg: assign sense_len instead of fixed SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] bsg: assign sense_len instead of fixed SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:32:34 +0200
Cc
: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
2dd8381929af2037a6eec3086256f54f55c01e78.1502120928.git.bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Looks fine, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
References
:
[RFC PATCH 0/6] bsg: fix regression resulting in panics when sending commands via BSG and some sanity cleanups
From:
Benjamin Block
[RFC PATCH 2/6] bsg: assign sense_len instead of fixed SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE
From:
Benjamin Block
Prev by Date:
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] bsg: fix kernel panic resulting from missing allocation of a reply-buffer
Next by Date:
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] bsg: scsi-transport: add compile-tests to prevent reply-buffer overflows
Previous by thread:
[RFC PATCH 2/6] bsg: assign sense_len instead of fixed SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE
Next by thread:
[RFC PATCH 4/6] bsg: refactor ioctl to use regular BSG-command infrastructure for SG_IO
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]