On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 18:28 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Well, maybe; however, the current logic fails to match the entry
>
> {"HITACHI", "OPEN-", "*", BLIST_REPORTLUN2},
>
> against the 'real' name, which is "HITACHI" "OPEN-V".
> And for some reason we have far more customer using Hitachi arrays than
> using scanner of dubious provenance with no Vendor (which is the real
> bug if you ask me...)
Hello Hannes,
So for some entries in the table a prefix match should be performed (e.g. the
model string for the Hitachi entry) but for other entries (e.g. the scanner
entry) an exact match should be performed on the vendor name? If so, how about
one of the following two approaches:
* Adding ".*" at the end of the entries in the table for which a prefix match
is sufficient and to change scsi_dev_info_list_find() such that it performs
a regex match instead of an exact match or a prefix match.
* Performing an exact match on the vendor name and a prefix match on the model
name.
Thanks,
Bart.
