Ju, Seokmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a third patch which follows prevous two patches ([PATCH 1/3] and
> [PATCH 2/3]).
Either use a [0/3] mail that describes the complete changeset or just send
each patch as a reply to the previous one. This way they are grouped together
in the mail programs. That keeps the inbox clean and the relationsship is
clearer.
> Signed-Off By: Seokmann Ju <seokmann.ju@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff -Naur inqwithevpd/Documentation/scsi/ChangeLog.megaraid
> unaligned/Documentation/scsi/ChangeLog.megaraid
> --- inqwithevpd/Documentation/scsi/ChangeLog.megaraid 2006-07-24
> 15:35:02.000000000 -0400
> +++ unaligned/Documentation/scsi/ChangeLog.megaraid 2006-07-24
> 15:41:49.000000000 -0400
> @@ -66,6 +66,61 @@
> Fix: MegaRAID F/W has fixed the problem and being process of
> release,
> soon. Meanwhile, driver will filter out the request.
>
> +3. One of member in the data structure of the driver leads unaligne
^^^^^^^^
> + issue on 64-bit platform.
> + Customer reporeted "kernel unaligned access addrss" issue when
^^^^^^
Typos.
> + > -----Original Message-----
[...]
This is IMHO too much data for an in-kernel changelog. I would vote for
including this in your commit comments, then it will be available as git
comment and not inflate the kernel tree itself with text that's useless for
most users. This is really only of interest if someone tries to find out
something about the changes in this driver and then he's normally also
interested in the diffs itself.
Eike
Attachment:
pgptT7kNGTKb0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
