Hi All
Please ignore about this patch.
Just my mistake.
Sorry.
Brs
Xiubo
On 2017年07月11日 15:40, lixiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Before the data area dynamic grow patches, though the overflow
bug was already exist, since the data area memories are all
preallocated, so there mostly won't any bad page fault core
trace produced.
The dynamic grow patches will only allocate and map the block
needed in data area, so when memcpy overflow, the system will
die.
[ 367.864705] [c0000000fc657340] [c0000000000d220c] do_exit+0x79c/0xcf0
[ 367.864710] [c0000000fc657410] [c0000000000249a4] die+0x314/0x470
[ 367.864715] [c0000000fc6574a0] [c00000000005425c] bad_page_fault+0xdc/0x150
[ 367.864720] [c0000000fc657510] [c000000000008964] handle_page_fault+0x2c/0x30
[ 367.864726] --- interrupt: 300 at memcpy_power7+0x20c/0x840
[ 367.864726] LR = tcmu_queue_cmd+0x844/0xa80 [target_core_user]
[ 367.864732] [c0000000fc657800] [d0000000088916d8] tcmu_queue_cmd+0x768/0xa80 [target_core_user] (unreliable)
[ 367.864746] [c0000000fc657940] [d000000002993184] __target_execute_cmd+0x54/0x150 [target_core_mod]
[ 367.864758] [c0000000fc657970] [d000000002994708] transport_generic_new_cmd+0x158/0x2d0 [target_core_mod]
[ 367.864770] [c0000000fc6579f0] [d0000000029948e4] transport_handle_cdb_direct+0x64/0xd0 [target_core_mod]
[ 367.864783] [c0000000fc657a60] [d000000002994af8] target_submit_cmd_map_sgls+0x1a8/0x320 [target_core_mod]
[ 367.864796] [c0000000fc657af0] [d000000002994cb8] target_submit_cmd+0x48/0x60 [target_core_mod]
[ 367.864803] [c0000000fc657b90] [d000000002a54bd0] ibmvscsis_scheduler+0x350/0x5c0 [ibmvscsis]
[ 367.864808] [c0000000fc657c50] [c0000000000f1c28] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x5b0
[ 367.864813] [c0000000fc657ce0] [c0000000000f2098] worker_thread+0xa8/0x650
[ 367.864818] [c0000000fc657d80] [c0000000000fa864] kthread+0x114/0x140
[ 367.864823] [c0000000fc657e30] [c0000000000098f0] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x6c
[ 367.864827] Instruction dump:
[ 367.864829] 60420000 7fe3fb78 4bfcd175 60000000 4bfffecc 7c0802a6 f8010010 60000000
[ 367.864838] 7c0802a6 f8010010 f821ffe1 e9230690 <e869ffd8> 38210020 e8010010 7c0803a6
[ 367.864847] ---[ end trace 8d085df7e65f7d20 ]---
[ 367.870358]
[ 367.870362] Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
[ 388.859695] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
[ 388.859717] 16-...: (0 ticks this GP) idle=7e3/140000000000000/0 softirq=12245/12245 fqs=2622
[ 388.859722] (detected by 20, t=5252 jiffies, g=12458, c=12457, q=2904)
[ 388.859744] Task dump for CPU 16:
[ 388.859747] kworker/16:2 D 0000000000000000 0 6865 0 0x00000800
[ 388.859762] Call Trace:
[ 388.859768] [c0000000fc6579a0] [c0000000014ef090] sysctl_sched_migration_cost+0x0/0x4 (unreliable)
[ 388.859778] [c0000000fc6579c0] [d000000008890c1c] tcmu_parse_cdb+0x2c/0x40 [target_core_user]
[ 388.859782] [c0000000fc6579e0] [c0000000fc657a60] 0xc0000000fc657a60
Reported-by: Bryant G. Ly <bryantly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
index 930800c..86a845a 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int scatter_data_area(struct tcmu_dev *udev,
to_offset = get_block_offset_user(udev, dbi,
block_remaining);
offset = DATA_BLOCK_SIZE - block_remaining;
- to = (void *)(unsigned long)to + offset;
+ to = (void *)((unsigned long)to + offset);
if (*iov_cnt != 0 &&
to_offset == iov_tail(udev, *iov)) {
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void gather_data_area(struct tcmu_dev *udev, struct tcmu_cmd *cmd,
copy_bytes = min_t(size_t, sg_remaining,
block_remaining);
offset = DATA_BLOCK_SIZE - block_remaining;
- from = (void *)(unsigned long)from + offset;
+ from = (void *)((unsigned long)from + offset);
tcmu_flush_dcache_range(from, copy_bytes);
memcpy(to + sg->length - sg_remaining, from,
copy_bytes);
