Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 17:09:58 -0400
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20170630080352.mmfyjjxsznzx75yf@mwanda> (Dan Carpenter's message of "Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:03:53 +0300")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

Dan,

> If lpfc_nvmet_unsol_fcp_issue_abort() fails then we accidentally
> increment "tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error" and then two lines later we
> increment it a second time.

Applied to 4.13/scsi-queue.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors
  - From: Dan Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][scsi-next] scsi: qla2xxx: fix a bunch of typos and spelling mistakes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: lpfc: don't double count abort errors
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: lpfc: spin_lock_irq() is not nestable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux