> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-scsi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-scsi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hannes Reinecke > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 3:31 PM > To: goggin, edward > Cc: michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx; dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; > linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; agk@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC] move scsi parts of dm hw handlers to > scsi layer > > Am Fr 21.07.2006 21:10 schrieb Edward Goggin <egoggin@xxxxxxx>: > > > > IIRC this is > > > > > > 'DGC' 'DISK' > > > 'DGC' 'RAID 10' > > > 'DGC' 'RAID 5' > > > > And 'DGC' 'LUNZ' > > > Yeah. But I left that one out as there is no device attached to it > so we're unlikely to require a hw handler, or? Isn't the scsi hw handler independent of DM though? Also, even in the DM case, it is useful to be able to parse sense codes associated with failed IO to a LUNZ CLARiiON logical unit. > > > What about supporting a wildcard model string? > > > Well, we're having that. > So 'DGC' 'DISK' and > 'DGC' 'RAID*' should be okay. > > Cheers, > > Hannes > > - > : send the line "unsubscribe > linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
