Re: [PATCH 05/11] Break up IO ctx list into a separate get and put list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/16/2017 07:56 AM, James Smart wrote:
> Since unsol rcv ISR and command cmpl ISR both access/lock
> this list, a separate get/put lists will reduce contention.
> 
> Replaced
> struct list_head lpfc_nvmet_ctx_list;
> with
> struct list_head lpfc_nvmet_ctx_get_list;
> struct list_head lpfc_nvmet_ctx_put_list;
> and all correpsonding locks and counters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c    | 11 ++++--
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c | 11 ++++--
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c    | 16 +++++---
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c   | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli4.h    |  9 +++--
>  5 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
> index af22602b1058..4ed48ed38e79 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
> @@ -245,15 +245,18 @@ lpfc_nvme_info_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  				atomic_read(&tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp),
>  				atomic_read(&tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error));
>  
> -		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock);
> +		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock);
> +		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
>  		tot = phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_xri_cnt -
> -			phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_cnt;
> -		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock);
> +			(phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_cnt +
> +			phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_cnt);
> +		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
> +		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock);
>  
>  		len += snprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len,
>  				"IO_CTX: %08x  WAIT: cur %08x tot %08x\n"
>  				"CTX Outstanding %08llx\n",
> -				phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_cnt,
> +				phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_xri_cnt,
>  				phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_wait_cnt,
>  				phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_wait_total,
>  				tot);
Question is if you need the lock here; after all, we could just store
the values in local variables and drop the lock altogether ...

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c
> index cc49850e18a9..ed2850645e70 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c
> @@ -848,15 +848,18 @@ lpfc_debugfs_nvmestat_data(struct lpfc_vport *vport, char *buf, int size)
>  			spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
>  		}
>  
> -		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock);
> +		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock);
> +		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
>  		tot = phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_xri_cnt -
> -			phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_cnt;
> -		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock);
> +			(phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_cnt +
> +			phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_cnt);
> +		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
> +		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock);
>  
>  		len += snprintf(buf + len, size - len,
>  				"IO_CTX: %08x  WAIT: cur %08x tot %08x\n"
>  				"CTX Outstanding %08llx\n",
> -				phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_cnt,
> +				phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_xri_cnt,
>  				phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_wait_cnt,
>  				phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_wait_total,
>  				tot);
Same here.

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> index 77283705eb8d..7e73fdc154f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> @@ -1281,10 +1281,13 @@ lpfc_hb_timeout_handler(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>  		/* Check outstanding IO count */
>  		if (phba->cfg_enable_fc4_type & LPFC_ENABLE_NVME) {
>  			if (phba->nvmet_support) {
> -				spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock);
> +				spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock);
> +				spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
>  				tot = phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_xri_cnt -
> -					phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_cnt;
> -				spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock);
> +					(phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_cnt +
> +					phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_cnt);
> +				spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
> +				spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock);
>  			} else {
>  				tot = atomic_read(&phba->fc4NvmeIoCmpls);
>  				data1 = atomic_read(
> @@ -3487,7 +3490,6 @@ lpfc_sli4_nvmet_sgl_update(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>  
>  	/* For NVMET, ALL remaining XRIs are dedicated for IO processing */
>  	nvmet_xri_cnt = phba->sli4_hba.max_cfg_param.max_xri - els_xri_cnt;
> -
>  	if (nvmet_xri_cnt > phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_xri_cnt) {
>  		/* els xri-sgl expanded */
>  		xri_cnt = nvmet_xri_cnt - phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_xri_cnt;
> @@ -5935,7 +5937,8 @@ lpfc_sli4_driver_resource_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>  		spin_lock_init(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_abts_nvme_buf_list);
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_abts_nvmet_ctx_list);
> -		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_list);
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_get_list);
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_put_list);
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_io_wait_list);
>  
>  		/* Fast-path XRI aborted CQ Event work queue list */
> @@ -5944,7 +5947,8 @@ lpfc_sli4_driver_resource_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>  
>  	/* This abort list used by worker thread */
>  	spin_lock_init(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
> -	spin_lock_init(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock);
> +	spin_lock_init(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock);
> +	spin_lock_init(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
>  	spin_lock_init(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_wait_lock);
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
> index 431faa0a4f3e..5fb29735e236 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
> @@ -267,11 +267,11 @@ lpfc_nvmet_ctxbuf_post(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_nvmet_ctxbuf *ctx_buf)
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_wait_lock, iflag);
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock, iflag);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock, iflag);
>  	list_add_tail(&ctx_buf->list,
> -		      &phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_list);
> -	phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_cnt++;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock, iflag);
> +		      &phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_put_list);
> +	phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_cnt++;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock, iflag);
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> @@ -865,28 +865,46 @@ lpfc_nvmet_cleanup_io_context(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>  	struct lpfc_nvmet_ctxbuf *ctx_buf, *next_ctx_buf;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(
> -		ctx_buf, next_ctx_buf,
> -		&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_list, list) {
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(
> -			&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
What is that doing here? Shouldn't it be moved to the next list_for_each?

> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx_buf, next_ctx_buf,
> +			&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_get_list, list) {
> +		spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
>  		list_del_init(&ctx_buf->list);
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(
> -			&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock, flags);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
>  		__lpfc_clear_active_sglq(phba,
>  					 ctx_buf->sglq->sli4_lxritag);
>  		ctx_buf->sglq->state = SGL_FREED;
>  		ctx_buf->sglq->ndlp = NULL;
>  
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock, flags);
> +		spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
>  		list_add_tail(&ctx_buf->sglq->list,
>  			      &phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_sgl_list);
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock,
> -				       flags);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
>  
>  		lpfc_sli_release_iocbq(phba, ctx_buf->iocbq);
>  		kfree(ctx_buf->context);
>  	}
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx_buf, next_ctx_buf,
> +			&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_put_list, list) {
> +		spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
> +		list_del_init(&ctx_buf->list);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.abts_nvme_buf_list_lock);
> +		__lpfc_clear_active_sglq(phba,
> +					 ctx_buf->sglq->sli4_lxritag);
> +		ctx_buf->sglq->state = SGL_FREED;
> +		ctx_buf->sglq->ndlp = NULL;
> +
> +		spin_lock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
> +		list_add_tail(&ctx_buf->sglq->list,
> +			      &phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_sgl_list);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.sgl_list_lock);
> +
> +		lpfc_sli_release_iocbq(phba, ctx_buf->iocbq);
> +		kfree(ctx_buf->context);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  static int
See above. Holding two locks at the same time as the old one doesn't
really reduce contention, no?

> @@ -958,12 +976,12 @@ lpfc_nvmet_setup_io_context(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>  					"6407 Ran out of NVMET XRIs\n");
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  		}
> -		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock);
> +		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock);
>  		list_add_tail(&ctx_buf->list,
> -			      &phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_list);
> -		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock);
> +			      &phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_get_list);
> +		spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock);
>  	}
> -	phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_cnt = phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_xri_cnt;
> +	phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_cnt = phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_xri_cnt;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
Why is this not not protected by a spinlock?
The very first hunk suggested that it should...

> @@ -1370,13 +1388,31 @@ lpfc_nvmet_unsol_fcp_buffer(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
>  		goto dropit;
>  	}
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock, iflag);
> -	if (phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_cnt) {
> -		list_remove_head(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_list,
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock, iflag);
> +	if (phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_cnt) {
> +		list_remove_head(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_get_list,
>  				 ctx_buf, struct lpfc_nvmet_ctxbuf, list);
> -		phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_cnt--;
> +		phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_cnt--;
> +	} else {
> +		spin_lock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
> +		if (phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_cnt) {
> +			list_splice(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_put_list,
> +				    &phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_get_list);
> +			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_put_list);
> +			phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_cnt =
> +				phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_cnt;
> +			phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_cnt = 0;
> +			spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
> +
> +			list_remove_head(
> +				&phba->sli4_hba.lpfc_nvmet_ctx_get_list,
> +				ctx_buf, struct lpfc_nvmet_ctxbuf, list);
> +			phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_cnt--;
> +		} else {
> +			spin_unlock(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_put_lock);
> +		}
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_io_lock, iflag);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->sli4_hba.nvmet_ctx_get_lock, iflag);
>  
>  	fc_hdr = (struct fc_frame_header *)(nvmebuf->hbuf.virt);
>  	oxid = be16_to_cpu(fc_hdr->fh_ox_id);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli4.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli4.h
> index 830dc83b9c21..7a1d74e9e877 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli4.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli4.h
> @@ -621,7 +621,8 @@ struct lpfc_sli4_hba {
>  	uint16_t scsi_xri_start;
>  	uint16_t els_xri_cnt;
>  	uint16_t nvmet_xri_cnt;
> -	uint16_t nvmet_ctx_cnt;
> +	uint16_t nvmet_ctx_get_cnt;
> +	uint16_t nvmet_ctx_put_cnt;
>  	uint16_t nvmet_io_wait_cnt;
>  	uint16_t nvmet_io_wait_total;
>  	struct list_head lpfc_els_sgl_list;
> @@ -630,7 +631,8 @@ struct lpfc_sli4_hba {
>  	struct list_head lpfc_abts_nvmet_ctx_list;
>  	struct list_head lpfc_abts_scsi_buf_list;
>  	struct list_head lpfc_abts_nvme_buf_list;
> -	struct list_head lpfc_nvmet_ctx_list;
> +	struct list_head lpfc_nvmet_ctx_get_list;
> +	struct list_head lpfc_nvmet_ctx_put_list;
>  	struct list_head lpfc_nvmet_io_wait_list;
>  	struct lpfc_sglq **lpfc_sglq_active_list;
>  	struct list_head lpfc_rpi_hdr_list;
> @@ -662,7 +664,8 @@ struct lpfc_sli4_hba {
>  	spinlock_t abts_nvme_buf_list_lock; /* list of aborted SCSI IOs */
>  	spinlock_t abts_scsi_buf_list_lock; /* list of aborted SCSI IOs */
>  	spinlock_t sgl_list_lock; /* list of aborted els IOs */
> -	spinlock_t nvmet_io_lock;
> +	spinlock_t nvmet_ctx_get_lock; /* list of avail XRI contexts */
> +	spinlock_t nvmet_ctx_put_lock; /* list of avail XRI contexts */
>  	spinlock_t nvmet_io_wait_lock; /* IOs waiting for ctx resources */
>  	uint32_t physical_port;
>  
> 
Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux