Re: question about sd_sync_cache and shutdown

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Christie wrote:
[...]
> for a orderly removal of some object, like someone shutting down
> a iscsi session, we are going to hit that path, but the command will not
> get sent. However, for unorderly removal, like ripping out a usb device
> or FC rport or iSCSI session being removed due to dev_loss_tmp expiring
> then we do not want the command sent. So it seems like it may be
> intended behavior.

Certainly depends on how the SCSI mid-low API is used. I only know how
sbp2 does it. It calls scsi_remove_device on soft shutdown as well as on
hot unplug. (Earlier it only called scsi_remove_host which calls
scsi_remove_device.) The last time I checked (2.6.16), this *always*
called SCSI high-level's shutdown methods, particularly sd_sync_cache.
sbp2 sends that command in the soft shutdown case but completes it with
DID_NO_CONNECT in the hot unplug case, like any other commands.

I don't know which states an "sdev" and "shost" is exactly put through,
and luckily I never needed to know so far. Sbp2 does not use
scsi_device_set_state. It also does not deal with "starget" or any
transport sidekick.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- -=== -==--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux