Bart, Will make available in the next upstream, once it has a chance to go through our internal test cycle. Regards, Quinn Tran -----Original Message----- From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 4:41 PM To: "Tran, Quinn" <Quinn.Tran@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Madhani, Himanshu" <Himanshu.Madhani@xxxxxxxxxx>, "martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/25] qla2xxx: Remove redundant code On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 22:14 +0000, Tran, Quinn wrote: > > I think an initiator could get > really confused if it receives two responses for the same exchange. > > QT: I do see the window youʼre describing in the qlt_try_to_dequeue_unknown_atios(). > Will have to follow up with another patch. This patch is not meant for this window > youʼve just identify. Hello Quinn, Has that patch been included in v2 of this series or will that patch perhaps be made available later? Thanks, Bart.