On 05/30/2017 05:14 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Hi all, > > we've seen reports for a crash with an invalid timer_list->function, > which turned out to be an unsafe usage of libfc discovery callbacks. > This patchset fixes up the problem > > As usual, comments and reviews are welcome. The patches look good themselves, but I'd prefer a *why* in the commit message. For instance in patch 1 you have: "Move 'pending' and 'requested' setting out of fc_disc_gpn_fc_req() into the calling function. No functional change." But why do you need to move the 'pending' and 'requested' settings? With an a bit more verbose changelog Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@xxxxxxxxxx> for the whole series -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
