On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 14:53 -0700, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
> @@ -1851,17 +1851,13 @@ static int __qlt_24xx_handle_abts(struct scsi_qla_host *vha,
> struct se_session *se_sess = sess->se_sess;
> struct qla_tgt_mgmt_cmd *mcmd;
> struct se_cmd *se_cmd;
> - u32 lun = 0;
> int rc;
> bool found_lun = false;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&se_sess->sess_cmd_lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry(se_cmd, &se_sess->sess_cmd_list, se_cmd_list) {
> - struct qla_tgt_cmd *cmd =
> - container_of(se_cmd, struct qla_tgt_cmd, se_cmd);
> if (se_cmd->tag == abts->exchange_addr_to_abort) {
> - lun = cmd->unpacked_lun;
> found_lun = true;
> break;
> }
> @@ -1900,7 +1896,7 @@ static int __qlt_24xx_handle_abts(struct scsi_qla_host *vha,
> mcmd->reset_count = vha->hw->chip_reset;
> mcmd->tmr_func = QLA_TGT_ABTS;
>
> - rc = ha->tgt.tgt_ops->handle_tmr(mcmd, lun, mcmd->tmr_func,
> + rc = ha->tgt.tgt_ops->handle_tmr(mcmd, 0, mcmd->tmr_func,
> abts->exchange_addr_to_abort);
> if (rc != 0) {
> ql_dbg(ql_dbg_tgt_mgt, vha, 0xf052,
Hello Himanshu and Quinn,
A LIO target driver should not make any assumptions about whether or not LUN 0
exists. Please modify this patch such that the LUN through which the task
management function was received is passed to the LIO core instead of passing 0.
Bart.
