On 05/10/2017 09:07 PM, James Smart wrote: > Large block writes to the nvme target were failing because > the default number of RQs posted was insufficient. > > Expand the NVMET RQs to 2048 RQEs and ensure a minimun of 2048 512^^^^ > RQEs are posted, no matter how many MRQs are configured. > > Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 20 +++++++++++++++----- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c | 2 +- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.h | 1 + > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli4.h | 1 + > 6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c > index 41ec7451689b..ee4d9be95960 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c > @@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ > #define LPFC_MIN_DEVLOSS_TMO 1 > #define LPFC_MAX_DEVLOSS_TMO 255 > > -#define LPFC_DEF_MRQ_POST 256 > +#define LPFC_DEF_MRQ_POST 512 > #define LPFC_MIN_MRQ_POST 32 > -#define LPFC_MAX_MRQ_POST 512 > +#define LPFC_MAX_MRQ_POST 2048 > The minimum is actually 512, isn't it? Otherwise: Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx> Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)