[PATCH] scsi: lpfc: ensure els_wq is being checked before destroying it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I believe there is a typo on the wq destroy of els_wq, currently
the driver is checking if els_cq is not null and I think this
should be a check on els_wq instead.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1411629 ("Copy-paste error")

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index 90ae354a9c45..c925bbe9b35d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -8847,7 +8847,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_queue_unset(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
 		lpfc_wq_destroy(phba, phba->sli4_hba.nvmels_wq);
 
 	/* Unset ELS work queue */
-	if (phba->sli4_hba.els_cq)
+	if (phba->sli4_hba.els_wq)
 		lpfc_wq_destroy(phba, phba->sli4_hba.els_wq);
 
 	/* Unset unsolicited receive queue */
-- 
2.11.0




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux