On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Bart Van Assche
<Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 15:42 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c b/drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c
>> index cceddd995a4b..a5c97342fd5d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c
>> @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ static int __qedf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, int mode)
>> slowpath_params.drv_minor = QEDF_DRIVER_MINOR_VER;
>> slowpath_params.drv_rev = QEDF_DRIVER_REV_VER;
>> slowpath_params.drv_eng = QEDF_DRIVER_ENG_VER;
>> - memcpy(slowpath_params.name, "qedf", QED_DRV_VER_STR_SIZE);
>> + strncpy(slowpath_params.name, "qedf", QED_DRV_VER_STR_SIZE);
>> rc = qed_ops->common->slowpath_start(qedf->cdev, &slowpath_params);
>> if (rc) {
>> QEDF_ERR(&(qedf->dbg_ctx), "Cannot start slowpath.\n");
>
> Hello Kees,
>
> Although this patch looks fine to me, isn't strlcpy() preferred over strncpy()?
strlcpy doesn't zero-pad, so I think strncpy is preferred here,
otherwise we may risk leaving portions of the destination buffer
filled with uninitialized data, maybe leaking kernel memory contents.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
