RE: [PATCH 12/37] smartpqi: change functions to inline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 3:08 PM
> To: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Viswas G <viswas.g@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Gerry
> Morong <gerry.morong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mahesh Rajashekhara
> <mahesh.rajashekhara@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; POSWALD@xxxxxxxx; Scott
> Benesh <scott.benesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Don Brace
> <don.brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Bader Ali - Saleh
> <bader.alisaleh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kevin Barnett
> <kevin.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; joseph.szczypek@xxxxxxx; Scott Teel
> <scott.teel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Justin Lindley
> <justin.lindley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; John Hall <John.Hall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/37] smartpqi: change functions to inline
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 14:47 -0500, Don Brace wrote:
> > From: Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh <scott.benesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Don Brace <don.brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> > index 728db8f..523b730 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> > @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static struct pqi_io_request *pqi_alloc_io_request(
> >       return io_request;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void pqi_free_io_request(struct pqi_io_request *io_request)
> > +static inline void pqi_free_io_request(struct pqi_io_request *io_request)
> >  {
> >       atomic_dec(&io_request->refcount);
> >  }
> 
> A patch description should not only explain what has been changed but also
> why a change has been made. What is the reason that this function has been
> declared inline? Why do you think that the compiler is not smart enough to
> decide on its own to inline this function?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.

We could have given a patch description. I'll provide one.

Thanks,
Don Brace
ESC - Smart Storage
Microsemi Corporation






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux