Re: [PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/02/2017 02:33 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:57 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> The open-osd domain doesn't exist anymore, and mails to the list lead
>> to really annoying bounced that repeat every day.
>>
>> Also the primarydata address for Benny bounces, and while I have a new
>> one for him he doesn't seem to be maintaining the OSD code any more.
>>
>> Which beggs the question:  should we really leave the Supported status
>> in MAINTAINERS given that the code is barely maintained?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 4 ----
>>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 1bb06c5f7716..28dd83a1d9e2 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -9418,10 +9418,6 @@ F:	drivers/net/wireless/intersil/orinoco/
>>  
>>  OSD LIBRARY and FILESYSTEM
>>  M:	Boaz Harrosh <ooo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> -M:	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> -L:	osd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> -W:	http://open-osd.org
>> -T:	git git://git.open-osd.org/open-osd.git
>>  S:	Maintained
>>  F:	drivers/scsi/osd/
>>  F:	include/scsi/osd_*
> 
> Hah, you beat me to it! I was going to spin up a patch for this today.
> 
> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux