On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 16:44 +0200, Benjamin Block wrote: > I still wonder why we try 'so hard' scheduling a command for a dead > device, but as that seems to be the status quo, and only lacks in the > case where the LLD is already half-way gone, its ok for me too. I mean, > the order is a bit screwed.. we apparently first remove the driver and > post-factum try to drain the queue.. that is strange. Hello Benjamin, That's indeed strange. But I'm not sure whether it is possible to address this without changing all SCSI LLDs. Bart.
