Re: [PATCH RESEND] scsi: return correct blkprep status code in case scsi_init_io() fails.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:43:22PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:46 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > When instrumenting the SCSI layer to run into the
> > !blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq) case the following  warning emitted from the
> > block layer:
> > 
> > blk_peek_request: bad return=-22
> > 
> > This happens because since commit fd3fc0b4d730 ('scsi: don't BUG_ON()
> > empty DMA transfers') we return the wrong error value from iscsi_prep_fn()
>                                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> There is no iscsi_prep_fn() in the kernel tree. Did you perhaps mean
> scsi_prep_fn()?

*doh* Yup, you're right.

> 
> > back to the block layer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: fd3fc0b4d730 scsi: don't BUG_ON() empty DMA transfers
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 
> Commit fd3fc0b4d730 has a "Cc: stable" tag. I assume that that means that
> this patch also needs that tag?

Probably yes. I'll include both "fixes" in my resend.

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux