On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 18:52:12 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 03:22:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Helge Hafting <helgehaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds > > > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. > > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-CF Rev: 1.64 > > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 > > > sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi removable disk sdf > > > sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 0 > > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-MS Rev: 1.64 > > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 > > > sd 3:0:0:1: Attached scsi removable disk sdg > > > sd 3:0:0:1: Attached scsi generic sg6 type 0 > > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-SM Rev: 1.64 > > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 > > > sd 3:0:0:2: Attached scsi removable disk sdh > > > sd 3:0:0:2: Attached scsi generic sg7 type 0 > > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-SD/MMC Rev: 1.64 > > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 > > > I assume this is still the broken-barriers bug. Thanks for all the help on > > this, guys. More is to be asked for, I'm afraid. > > > > I've prepared a tree which is basically 2.6.17-mm5, only the git-scsi-misc > > and git-libata-all trees have been omitted. It's at > > What does USB storage have to do with SATA? > Please read the mailing list - several of these reports have been with sata. Yes, thank you. As this report is against usb-storage then the bug most probably lies in git-scsi-misc. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
