Re: [PATCH] osd_uld: Check scsi_device_get() return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] osd_uld: Check scsi_device_get() return value
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 12:44:39 -0400
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, James Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Boaz Harrosh <ooo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1D08B61A9CF0974AA09887BE32D889DA12E934@ULS-OP-MBXIP03.sdcorp.global.sandisk.com> (Bart Van Assche's message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:17:17 +0000")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Bart,

> scsi_device_get() can fail. Hence check its return value.

Applied to 4.12/scsi-queue.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] osd_uld: Check scsi_device_get() return value
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 6/8] nvmet: Be careful about using iomem accesses when dealing with p2pmem
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Make checking the scsi_device_get() return value mandatory
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] osd_uld: Check scsi_device_get() return value
Next by thread: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux