>
> > + p2pmem_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("p2pmem", NULL);
> > + if (!p2pmem_debugfs_root)
> > + pr_info("could not create debugfs entry, continuing\n");
> > +
>
> Why continue? I think it'd be better to just fail it.
>
Because not having debugfs support isn't fatal to using p2pmem. So I
believe it is better to continue. But this is trivial, IMO, so either was
is ok with me.
> Besides, this can be safely squashed into patch 1.
Yes.
