Re: [PATCHv5 0/2] tcmu: For bugs fix only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 01:48 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Just for future reference, the flow of these tags should reflect the
> history of the patch.  Eg:
> 
> Reviewed-by: First reviewer <foo@xxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: First tester <foo2@xxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Second reviewer <foo3@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Patch Author <you@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> and then once the subsystem maintainer merges it into his tree, they add
> their own:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Subsystem Maintainer <superturboarray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Nic,

I agree that these tags should reflect the history of the patch. I think
that means that the patch author should be mentioned first, Reviewed-by /
Tested-by tags next and the subsystem maintainer sign-off last. At least,
that's how most other maintainers do it.

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux