[PATCH 6/6] scsi: ufs: just use sizeof() for snprintf()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Tomohiro Kusumi <tkusumi@xxxxxxxxxx>

Not much reason to use ARRAY_SIZE() when we know it's for a C string.

Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <tkusumi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 109a762..790c19c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -7880,7 +7880,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
 		INIT_WORK(&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work,
 			  ufshcd_clk_scaling_resume_work);
 
-		snprintf(wq_name, ARRAY_SIZE(wq_name), "ufs_clkscaling_%d",
+		snprintf(wq_name, sizeof(wq_name), "ufs_clkscaling_%d",
 			 host->host_no);
 		hba->clk_scaling.workq = create_singlethread_workqueue(wq_name);
 
-- 
2.9.3




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux