[PATCHv2 4/5] target/user: Fix wrongly calculating of the base_command_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The t_data_nents and t_bidi_data_nents are all the numbers of the
segments, and we couldn't be sure the size of the data area block
will equal to size of the segment.

Use the actually block number needed intead of the sum of segments.

Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
index 99cd239..117be07 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
@@ -650,8 +650,7 @@ static bool is_ring_space_avail(struct tcmu_dev *udev, struct tcmu_cmd *cmd,
 	 * expensive to tell how many regions are freed in the bitmap
 	*/
 	base_command_size = max(offsetof(struct tcmu_cmd_entry,
-				req.iov[se_cmd->t_bidi_data_nents +
-					se_cmd->t_data_nents]),
+				req.iov[tcmu_cmd->dbi_len]),
 				sizeof(struct tcmu_cmd_entry));
 	command_size = base_command_size
 		+ round_up(scsi_command_size(se_cmd->t_task_cdb), TCMU_OP_ALIGN_SIZE);
-- 
1.8.3.1






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux