Re: [RFC] hv_storvsc: error handling.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Was the invalid LUN in the LUN0 position. Inquiry of LUN0 support (when LUN0 is not populated)
> was added only recently to address host side issue.

How does HyperV expect device scanning to happen for a not populated LUN?

REPORT SUPPORTED LUNS but nothing else on LUN 0?  Maybe a TEST UNIT READY
thrown?  Or does it actually support the REPORT LUNS well known LU?



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux