> Was the invalid LUN in the LUN0 position. Inquiry of LUN0 support (when LUN0 is not populated) > was added only recently to address host side issue. How does HyperV expect device scanning to happen for a not populated LUN? REPORT SUPPORTED LUNS but nothing else on LUN 0? Maybe a TEST UNIT READY thrown? Or does it actually support the REPORT LUNS well known LU?