Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:11:59 -0500
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20170227203726.3420612-1-arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:37:12 +0100")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Arnd" == Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes:

Arnd> dma_addr_t may be either u32 or u64, depending on the kernel
Arnd> configuration, and we get a warning for the 32-bit case:

Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t
  - From: Arnd Bergmann

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error: count medium access timeout only once per EH run
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use div_u64 for 64-bit division
Previous by thread: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: use proper format string for dma_addr_t
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux