Re: [PATCHv3 09/10] mpt3sas: always use first reserved smid for ioctl passthrough

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:27:08PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> ioctl passthrough commands require a SCSIIO smid, but cannot
> easily integrate with the block layer. But the driver already
> has reserved some SCSIIO smids and we're only ever allowing
> one ioctl command at a time we can use the first reserved smid
> for ioctl commands.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_ctl.c  | 10 ++--------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> index 3f9148c..0875e58 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> @@ -2432,7 +2432,9 @@ struct scsiio_tracker *
>  		ioc->scsi_lookup[i].cb_idx = 0xFF;
>  		ioc->scsi_lookup[i].scmd = NULL;
>  		ioc->scsi_lookup[i].direct_io = 0;
> -		list_add(&ioc->scsi_lookup[i].tracker_list, &ioc->free_list);
> +		if (i < ioc->scsiio_depth - INTERNAL_SCSIIO_CMDS_COUNT)
> +			list_add(&ioc->scsi_lookup[i].tracker_list,
> +				 &ioc->free_list);
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->scsi_lookup_lock, flags);
>  
>  		_base_recovery_check(ioc);
> @@ -5174,8 +5176,11 @@ struct scsiio_tracker *
>  		ioc->scsi_lookup[i].smid = smid;
>  		ioc->scsi_lookup[i].scmd = NULL;
>  		ioc->scsi_lookup[i].direct_io = 0;
> -		list_add_tail(&ioc->scsi_lookup[i].tracker_list,
> -		    &ioc->free_list);
> +		if (i < ioc->scsiio_depth - INTERNAL_SCSIIO_CMDS_COUNT)
> +			list_add_tail(&ioc->scsi_lookup[i].tracker_list,
> +				      &ioc->free_list);
> +		else
> +			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ioc->lookup[i].tracker_list);

Why the INIT_LIST_HEAD?  We never do a list_empty check on tracker_list,
so it's rather pointless.

> +		smid = ioc->scsiio_depth - ioc->host->reserved_cmds;

ioc->host->reserved_cmds is never set at this point.  But given that only
the smids < ioc->scsiio_depth are used it's doing the right thing
if you just remove the "- ioc->host->reserved_cmds" entirely.

Otherwise this looks fine to me.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux