On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote: > When sending a TMF via the ioctl interface we should be using > the hi-priority queue instead of the scsi queue to be consistent > with overall TMF usage. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_ctl.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_ctl.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_ctl.c > index 95f0f24..e952175 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_ctl.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_ctl.c > @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ enum block_state { > } > } else { > > - smid = mpt3sas_base_get_smid_scsiio(ioc, ioc->ctl_cb_idx, NULL); > + smid = mpt3sas_base_get_smid_hpr(ioc, ioc->ctl_cb_idx); This else part is not for TM path, It is for IO path. For the TM request we are already using smid from hpr queue, as shown below if (mpi_request->Function == MPI2_FUNCTION_SCSI_TASK_MGMT) { smid = mpt3sas_base_get_smid_hpr(ioc, ioc->ctl_cb_idx); if (!smid) { pr_err(MPT3SAS_FMT "%s: failed obtaining a smid\n", ioc->name, __func__); ret = -EAGAIN; goto out; } } else { smid = mpt3sas_base_get_smid_scsiio(ioc, ioc->ctl_cb_idx, NULL); Thanks, Sreekanth > if (!smid) { > pr_err(MPT3SAS_FMT "%s: failed obtaining a smid\n", > ioc->name, __func__); > -- > 1.8.5.6 >